J the App
HomeWhat We DoFeaturesPostsDownload App
HomeWhat We DoFeaturesPosts
Download App
Terms|Privacy

JustIDT Solutions Private Limited © 2026

  1. Home
  2. Posts
  3. Indirect Tax
  4. About the Omitted Rule 96(10) without a Saving clause
Goods and Service TaxArticle·15 June 2025

About the Omitted Rule 96(10) without a Saving clause

By J the App

Executive Summary

The recent ruling by the Gujarat High Court aligns with the stance of the Kerala High Court, previously denouncing Rule 96(10) as "ultra vires" and arbitrary. Similarly, High Courts in Punjab & Haryana, Bombay, and Madras have also paused the enforcement and recovery procedures under Rule 96(10). These combined judicial decisions are expected to bring closure to a long-standing and contentious issue that has faced challenges from Revenue authorities striving to rectify erroneously granted refund claims. J the App by JustIDT is delighted to share the snapshot on the probable steps forward.

In the matter of Addwrap Packaging Pvt. Ltd. & anr. vs. Union of India & Ors in Special Civil Application No. 22519 of 2019, the Hon’b...

Read the full article in the app

This is a premium article. Download J the App to read the complete content.

Read in the App

Get the full experience with comments, likes, and more in the app.

Open in App
App StoreGoogle Play